Sunbrick vs Ossila Solar Simulator

When precision matters, not all solar simulators measure up. This side-by-side look at the G2V Sunbrick and Ossila’s simulator highlights key differences in standards compliance, integration, and performance, so you can confidently choose.

Sunbrick vs Ossila: Spec-by-Spec Breakdown

Feature G2V Sunbrick Ossila Solar Simulator Questions To Ask Yourself
Area of Illumination 15 cm × 15 cm (Class A+) 15 mm diameter (Class A), up to 32 mm diameter (Class C) Will my Device Under Test (DUT) increase in size as my research progresses?
Spectral Range 350 nm – 1200 nm 380 nm – 1000 nm Do I need UV below 380 nm or NIR coverage beyond 1000 nm?
Spectral Control 32 Tunable channels 11 Tunable channels What resolution in spectrum control do I want to future proof my experiments?
IEC 60904-9 Compliance Class A+A+A+ Class AAA Do I need certified, high-accuracy performance over larger areas?
Spectral deviation (SPD) <25% <70% Do I require light that closely matches the sun?
Spectral Match < ±12.5% < ±25% Do I require light that closely matches the sun?
Long-Term Temporal Stability <2% <2% How sensitive are my experiments to light stability over time?
Spatial Uniformity <1% (15 cm) <1% (1.5 cm) Do I need consistent irradiance over the full sample surface? How will I know if my sample isn't being irradiated uniformly?
Lifetime 10,000+ hours 10,000 hours Will long-term consistency reduce repeat testing or recalibration?
Software & API GUI + Python API Basic GUI with USB-C control Will I need automation, scripting, or lab instrument integration?
Price Point ~$56.00/cm^2 (Class A+A+A+ over 225 cm²) ~$2,150/cm^2 (Class A over ~1.8 cm²) Is a lower purchase cost with a higher cost/cm^2 worth limitations in precision, coverage, and automation? Do I know any colleagues or group labs who would pool money together for a higher-tier instrument?

Sunbrick vs. Ossila Solar Simulator Summary

The G2V Sunbrick stands out with its expansive and scalable illumination area, extensive range of 350 nm – 1200 nm, and advanced spectral control with up to 32 tunable LED channels. Its compliance with Class A+A+A+ standards ensures high precision, making it ideal for sophisticated research requiring stringent testing conditions and integration with various lab instruments.

In contrast, the Ossila Solar Simulator offers a smaller footprint and is suitable for basic solar simulation needs. With a smaller illumination area and limited spectral range (380–1000 nm), it serves well for preliminary testing. Still, it may fall short for advanced research requiring broader spectral coverage, higher uniformity and real-world testing.

When choosing between the two, consider the need for a larger IEC standard-compliant area, integration capabilities with existing lab equipment, and enhanced spectral control and accuracy.

What You Risk and What You Gain in Your Solar Simulator Choice

What You Risk with the Ossila Solar Simulator

  • Lack of Spectral Fidelity
    The spectrum deviates significantly from standard solar conditions up to 70% in some regions, falling short of IEC 60904:2020 spectral match requirements.
  • Your sample sizes will not be able to grow their Certified Test Area
    Only a 15 mm diameter area meets Class A standards, limiting you to small-area devices and preventing meaningful scalability.
  • Lack of automation
    Lacking advanced software or integration support. There is no Python API or direct automation, forcing manual operation and limiting repeatability.

What You Gain with the Sunbrick Solar Simulator

  • Accurate, Tunable Solar Simulation
    32-channel LED control lets you replicate AM1.5G, AM0, or fully custom profiles with Class A+A+A+ performance across the latest IEC 60904-9:2020 standard.
  • Large, Certified Illumination Zone
    The Sunbrick delivers 15 cm × 15 cm of Class A+A+A+ coverage, 75× more areas than Ossila’s Class A zone, allowing complete device testing, multiplexing, or side-by-side comparisons.
  • Automation-Ready Architecture
    Built-in Python API control plus Keithley IV tool compatibility let you automate and scale your test workflow with confidence.
  • Built for Research, Not Demonstration
    With verified Class A+ spectral match, spatial uniformity under 1%, and temporal stability below 2%, the Sunbrick ensures your results stand up under peer review.
  • Cost-Efficient at Scale
    While the Ossila may appear affordable at first glance, its usable area drives the cost-per-cm² above $2,000. The Sunbrick delivers premium performance at ~$56/cm², built for the long term.

Why Leading Labs Choose Solar Simulators from G2V Optics

When precision matters, “good enough” isn’t. Leading institutions in photovoltaics, materials science, and photochemistry choose G2V because their research demands light they can trust, not a filtered approximation.

Whether you’re:

  • Validating next-gen solar cells

  • Testing real-world conditions

  • Or creating new photocatalytic materials

The Sunbrick delivers Engineered Sunlight™ with complete control, no filters, no drift, no compromises.

Ready to Elevate Your Lab?​

Fill out the form below to learn more about the G2V Optics Sunbrick - Precise Tunable LED Solar Simulation

Explore How Other Alternatives Compare To The G2V Optics Sunbrick

Finding a consistent format of information comparing solar simulators and other alternatives isn’t easy. Our articles are designed to consolidate the information and keep you from needing to explore endless pages of search results

Knowledge Base

Solar Simulator Standards & Applications Is Covered In Our Solar Simulation Knowledge Base!

Explore our knowledge base to learn more about customers’ work in the STEM field, the IEC standards, and the physics properties of light and how they apply to different applications. Our knowledge base is designed to make finding information on solar simulation faster than light.

Future of Green Hydrogen Production – Cideteq Case Study

Solar Simulator Prices: Determine the TCO before buying

Download PDF